
Is this really it? Am I falling into that white picket fence trap? I’m not a white picket fence kind of a girl. I was supposed to teach overseas and wander around Europe dating Michelangelo's and Niccolo’s with thick unruly hair, a wicked sense of style, “300 abs” and collect men with accents that could melt the thong off my perfectly toned ass. Why don’t I have the body of a goddess yet? And I don’t mean the fertility one. I wanted to walk the beaches of Greece with a bag filled only with contraband, a bottle of red wine and a bikini, visit that shoe museum in Amsterdam and couch surf for a while. What happened?
(Lol, see comment box.)
Sometimes I wonder why. Why did all these things happen to me? Is it a god thing? I’ve heard god only gives us as much as we can handle. I think that’s a load of bullshit because there are plenty of people who can’t deal and shut down or go crazy or many other things I’m not actually interested in getting into at the moment. I started thinking about Karma, the law of three, and energy. I believe in energy, everything just changes forms but it’s always a form of it. There are positive and negative people, and the negative ones are usually so depressing they naturally repel you, but then so can the positive ones when they have no ground to their thinking in reality. Think Pollyanna on crack. Still, it gives no meaning to anything.
The Law of Three is a Wiccan thang. Basically it means that what ever you put out comes back to you times three. Also another wheel-barrel full of manure next to that first one. It’s just a general principle coined by Raymond Buckland in 1968 and kind of got picked up by everybody. It reminds me of the Good Samaritan, the phrase “do unto others as they do unto you,” and you might want to rethink that curse spell work… a warning, the boogieman.
(Although if you want to get into a debate about different planes and levels of existence let me know. I’ve got a great story about quantum energy bananas.)
It all comes back to Karma. And the theory of Karma is a fundamental doctrine in Buddhism. Apparently it predated the Buddha, but he just explained it, how kind.
"“What is the cause of the inequality that exists among mankind?”
Either this inequality of mankind has a cause, or it is purely accidental. No sensible person would think of attributing this unevenness, this inequality, and this diversity to blind chance or pure accident."
Oh really? So if it’s not blind chance then it’s your actions from a previous life? Right.
""What is the cause, what is the reason, O Lord," questioned he, "that we find amongst mankind the short-lived and long-lived, the healthy and the diseased, the ugly and beautiful, those lacking influence and the powerful, the poor and the rich, the low-born and the high-born, and the ignorant and the wise?"
The Buddha’s reply was:
"All living beings have actions (Karma) as their own, their inheritance, their congenital cause, their kinsman, their refuge. It is Karma that differentiates beings into low and high states.""
I really feel the Cosmic Karma Past Lives Bank is a load of bull too. It does feel like official religious bull though. A story you can tell your kid at night that makes everything seem fair again in a weird way. Everything is cause and effect, action and result, Karma and Vipaka. This doesn’t mean you can’t change your life, it’s kind of all about changing it. How you view your circumstances and limitations. Limitations are self-imposed, even if other people impose them on us it is ultimately our decision to believe them or not. Are you just going to keep asking, “Why me? Why now? Why won’t it stop? Why again?” Or are you going to say, “Fuck it, it stops now.” I prefer the latter but am still struggling with the point. All those things I listed, they don’t bother me anymore. Actually I couldn’t care less, and I know what I want to be doing and am working towards that, but so what? So what indeed…
